Einstein, a genius scientist of the 20th century, and central to the new energy physics, stated that ?a problem can't be solved per equivalent mind set that created it?. Cancer is a case in point. Cancer is a dis-ease that stems partly from the products of the mechanistic, anthropomorphic and exploitative philosophy at the heart of our culture, which we tend to ignore. Its efficient coarse of action demands that we see ourselves in a different light and act accordingly.

Medicine is very slow to move from a mechanistic and physical philosophy to a even more energetic model, like the Gaian paradigm that values all life forms as attached. A philosophy of medicine that is over-reliant on logic and limited mainly to drugs and surgery is fundamental flawed. Acts of logic always rely on analysis, that is breaking down a ?whole? into its constituent parts, and examining every minutely. Reductionist approaches fail to see the connectivity and relatedness of all things. As a consequence this philosophy is offering us 'cures' to cancer that are typically as dangerous and destructive as the disease itself.

Nobel prize-winner Carlo Rubbia maintains that only a billionth of the globe is actually manufactured of matter and the rest is mass produced of energy. The new sciences are challenging the way we perceive the globe and as a consequence the way we relate to our bodies. Dr. K. Scott-Mumby is writer of Virtual Medicine and an allergy specialist in the UK writes:

Science is proving that we exist as regulated and informed energy. Disease can today be redefined as a disruption, cessation or even distortion in the information and energy fields. Its time for medical practitioners to join the party.

Classical science has reached the end of what it can explain in reductionist terms. Issues like whether light is a particle or even a wave, or even whether or even not water has a memory (an issue central to the 'proof' of homeopathy), are moving modern science to a quantum level that deals with fields of energy. Medical science is however stuck in a extremely physical universe, where the objective is to ?excise the lump? almost regardless of where it came from and individual conditions of the patient and their experiences.

New sciences like the chaos theories point a way forward into dealing with the complexities of whole systems that operate together, in synergy. Unfortunately our medical systems and practises are however too typically built on philosophy formulated in medieval times.

Because all interventions in a medical process have to been ?proven? as workable (using scientific double-blind testing methods) prior to doctors will recognise their validity (if they then do the research), medical science mostly marginalises or even ignores healing options that can provide only ?anecdotal evidence?. Multiple simultaneous treatments of different varieties and ?levels? tuned for 1 patient are un-testable by a reductionist philosophy and so ignored by mainstream medicine. In addition to this regulatory pressures force researchers and corporations to try out their drugs on patients with advanced cancer - when the dis-ease is much even more hard to treat and when the chances of success are mild - this means that potentially useful treatments are cast off as worthless.

Traditional research methodology, or even ?quantitative research? is central to science and more methodologies aren't usually acceptable. ?Qualitative research? is equally, if not even more significant at the present time in reference to cancer. More medical systems, like Chinese or even Ayurvedic medicine, Homeopathy or even Naturopathy utilise far subtler tools in both diagnosis and coarse of action. It is built on seeing the patient as a whole being and typically utilise multiple interventions on many levels, simultaneously in the coarse of action of dis-ease. Because they operate at the level of an individual patient, and from a different philosophy of medicine, it's almost impossible to look at them with the tools of reductionist science.

Our present rash of resistant attacking diseases calls for a different kind of response than just drugs and surgery. A new medicine that combines established scientific excellence with traditional, alternative and natural treatments is needed. 1 that recognises people as feeling, vibrant, energetic, spiritual beings as well as physical and mental. There are powerful developments in the course of action of cancer applying energy systems, however information on this is actually suppressed. There exists a movement towards an integrated medicine as even more orthodox practitioners are starting to join in, led mostly by their patients.

>From an energy point of see, when the human being body is infirm or even unbalanced it oscillates at different frequencies than when it's fit. This less harmonious frequency shows a state of cellular, energetic imbalance in the body. The physical body that is weakened in this way typically needs help to shift to the needed frequency, which strengthens the body.

A few experienced medical doctors can produce an intuitive diagnosis built on experience and can occasionally tell in a 2nd or even so what ails their patient. Posture, skin condition, nail, teeth and tongue all give clues, however experienced doctors could as well intuitively pick higher clues about their patients from energy and vibrational levels in a similar way to a gardener tending plants or even a uncivilized creature hunting its prey.

However modern doctors just don't have the time for the level of attention given in many complementary and alternative therapies. This is 1 of the reasons options are even more popular than ever. Professional detachment is an essential portion of the doctors? repertoire and it protects them in section from the huge amount of require they encounter in day to day operate.

Given the track record of orthodox medical science into whole individual medicine, it might well be an additional 200 years or even so prior to it's able to assimilate the new quantum sciences in relation to the person body. For those people with cancer at present, there are a deliberately limited range of alternatives available from orthodox medicine.

About Andy skinner

Simon Mitchell

This is an extract from 'Don't Get Cancer'a new ebook available only at: http://www.simonthescribe.co.uk/don'tget1.html

Article source: http://www.topiccenter.com/Health-and-Fitness/Cancer/